A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours above the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how the two Males entered the drinking water in the course of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the positioning became One of the more placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of actions had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as readers sought to understand the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second during the legal timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement above boundaries, Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as made, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become called meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and problems hooked up into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to planning law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal view, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have described their lengthy-standing link to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple merely trying to establish a household house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Unique Space of Conservation and say that all performs have been completed based on Specialist information and accredited options. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea through a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned the businessman had Earlier been involved in community advocacy on arranging and environmental issues, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from incredibly various Qualified backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the Bodily truth on the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with organizing authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing circumstances. Nonetheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another extended once the legal expenditures have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend over and above that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties which include environmental defense and house legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre from the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Whether or not it will eventually be altered, removed, or concluded as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.